With the release of MS 1480:2025, many food manufacturers are asking an urgent question:
Does our existing HACCP system still comply with the updated Malaysian standard?
The reality is:
HACCP systems developed under older versions may no longer fully comply
Gaps often exist even if operations appear unchanged
Auditors are already aligning expectations to the 2025 revision
MS 1480:2025 is the updated Malaysian Standard for:
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems
Food safety management principles aligned with current global practices
The update emphasizes:
Stronger risk-based thinking
Clearer hazard justification
Better system documentation and effectiveness
Many HACCP plans were:
Developed years ago
Based on older interpretations
Maintained without major revision
MS 1480:2025 raises expectations on:
How hazards are evaluated
How controls are justified
How systems are verified and updated
Common issues include:
Hazard analysis copied from old templates
Hazards not linked to actual process flow
Missing justification for inclusion or exclusion
MS 1480:2025 expects:
Process-specific hazard identification
Clear reasoning for hazard significance
Regular review based on changes and trends
Many companies struggle with:
Over-classifying CCPs
Inconsistent CCP decision criteria
Poor explanation of control effectiveness
Under MS 1480:2025:
CCP decisions must be justified
Control measures must be technically sound
Monitoring limits must be evidence-based
Frequent findings include:
PRPs documented but not effectively implemented
Weak cleaning and sanitation records
Poor pest control trend analysis
Inconsistent maintenance practices
MS 1480:2025 reinforces that:
PRPs are the foundation of HACCP
Weak PRPs undermine the entire system
Many HACCP systems:
Perform verification only during audits
Lack trend analysis of monitoring records
Do not validate control measures properly
The updated standard requires:
Ongoing verification activities
Evidence that controls work as intended
Data-driven system review
Changes often overlooked:
New raw materials
New suppliers
Process or equipment changes
Production scale-up
MS 1480:2025 expects:
HACCP review triggered by changes
Updated hazard analysis
Documented decision-making
Common problems:
HACCP team members unable to explain decisions
Over-reliance on consultants
Lack of refresher training
The updated standard emphasizes:
Team competency
Understanding, not memorization
Active participation in food safety decisions
Auditors now focus more on:
Logic and justification
Consistency between documents and practice
Effectiveness of controls
Real implementation, not paperwork
Typical audit questions include:
Why is this hazard significant?
How do you know this control works?
When was this HACCP plan last reviewed—and why?
🚩 HACCP documents have not been revised for years
🚩 CCPs exist “because they always have”
🚩 PRP issues keep repeating
🚩 Staff cannot explain monitoring rationale
🚩 HACCP reviews are audit-driven only
Review hazard analysis against current operations
Reassess CCP determination logic
Strengthen PRP implementation and records
Verify and validate control measures
Retrain HACCP team members
Document system reviews and changes
MS 1480:2025 aligns more closely with:
Risk-based food safety management
Continuous improvement concepts
ISO 22000 expectations
For companies planning ISO 22000:
HACCP compliance under MS 1480:2025 is critical
Weak HACCP systems often lead to ISO audit failures
MS 1480:2025 is not just a document update—it raises the expectation of how HACCP systems function in practice.
If your HACCP system has not been reviewed against the new standard:
Compliance risks increase
Audit outcomes become unpredictable
Food safety assurance weakens
The key question is no longer “Do we have HACCP?”
But “Is our HACCP system still compliant and effective today?”
Indonesia