With the introduction of MS 1480:2025, many food manufacturers assume that updating documents alone is sufficient.
In reality, one of the most common compliance gaps lies in food safety team competency.
So the key question is:
Do food safety teams really need retraining to comply with MS 1480:2025?
In most cases, yes—and for good reason.
MS 1480:2025 places stronger emphasis on:
Risk-based decision-making
Hazard justification
System effectiveness
Ongoing review and improvement
These changes directly impact:
HACCP team responsibilities
Decision-making logic
Ability to explain and defend food safety controls
Many food safety teams:
Were trained under older HACCP versions
Focused on form-filling rather than reasoning
Rely heavily on historical decisions
MS 1480:2025 expects teams to:
Understand why controls exist
Justify hazard significance
Explain CCP and PRP decisions confidently
Teams often struggle with:
Identifying process-specific hazards
Evaluating hazard significance objectively
Documenting clear justification
Retraining should cover:
Practical hazard identification
Risk-based thinking
Real-case analysis
Common gaps include:
Over-reliance on old CCP trees
Poor explanation of critical limits
Unclear corrective action logic
MS 1480:2025 requires:
Evidence-based CCP decisions
Clear monitoring rationale
Understanding of control effectiveness
Food safety teams may:
Treat PRPs as basic hygiene only
Fail to link PRPs to hazard control
Retraining should reinforce:
PRPs as the foundation of HACCP
Monitoring and trend analysis
Escalation when PRPs fail
Many teams:
Confuse verification with validation
Perform checks only during audits
Do not analyze trends
MS 1480:2025 emphasizes:
Ongoing verification
Pre-implementation validation
Data-driven review
Changes often missed by teams:
New ingredients or suppliers
Equipment modifications
Process adjustments
Retraining helps teams:
Recognize change triggers
Reassess hazards proactively
Document decisions properly
Auditors increasingly assess:
Team competency—not just documents
Ability to explain decisions
Consistency between practice and paperwork
Typical audit questions include:
Why is this hazard significant?
How do you know this control works?
When was the HACCP plan last reviewed—and why?
Without proper retraining:
These questions often expose major gaps
🚩 Team members rely heavily on consultants
🚩 HACCP decisions cannot be clearly explained
🚩 Repeated audit findings occur
🚩 HACCP reviews are audit-driven only
🚩 Training records are outdated
No. Retraining is about:
Updating understanding
Correcting outdated interpretations
Strengthening practical application
Effective retraining should:
Build on existing experience
Focus on real processes
Improve confidence during audits
Retraining should involve:
HACCP team members
QA/QC personnel
Production supervisors
Technical and operations managers
Anyone involved in food safety decisions
MS 1480:2025 aligns closely with:
ISO 22000 risk-based thinking
System effectiveness requirements
Continuous improvement principles
Proper retraining:
Reduces ISO audit risks
Improves system maturity
Strengthens food safety culture
MS 1480:2025 compliance is not achieved through documents alone.
It requires competent food safety teams who understand, apply, and defend food safety decisions.
If your team has not been retrained since the update:
Compliance risks increase
Audit confidence decreases
System effectiveness weakens
Retraining is not a cost—it is a critical investment in food safety assurance.
Indonesia